Jul 252011
 
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions

As ’s pared down charms New York, that jug­ger­naut of a musical, ’s ex-project, rolls on, charm­ing few. The con­trast got Los Angeles Times’ Mark Swed thinking:

Flute Spiderman Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions

Brook’s return to opera has been mainly to down­scale and refash­ion clas­sics — such as “Car­men,” Debussy’s “Pelléas et Mél­is­ande” and now his “Flute” — into intim­ate drama. Tay­mor, though, has taken the oppos­ite route.

She absorbed Asian influ­ences early and made theater in churches and other small spaces in New York for little money with devoted col­leagues. As she became bet­ter known, she found ways to bring her masks, her sense of ritual, her love of myth­o­logy bril­liantly into the main­stream. Her first major opera pro­duc­tion — Stravinsky’s “Oed­ipus Rex” in 1993 star­ring Jessye Nor­man, with Seiji Ozawa con­duct­ing in Japan — was one of the great mod­ern opera stagings.

But the big time began tak­ing its toll. Her Broad­way suc­cess with “Lion King” raised her ambi­tion. Hol­ly­wood called, and her film career has been uneven but also full of flashes of bril­liance. “Across the Uni­verse,” her Viet­nam War-era film set to Beatles songs, demon­strates a dir­ector with a mar­velous feel for com­bin­ing pop cul­ture, music and myth, just what was sup­posed to hap­pen in “Spider-Man.”

I wish Tay­mor had vis­ited the “Merce Fair,” where she would have seen an example of an artist who man­aged to avoid the need for nar­rat­ive over a long career. At this daylong event — which included per­form­ances by Cunningham’s com­pany, films, dis­cus­sion and con­certs — chil­dren played with a helium-filled Mylar pil­lows Andy War­hol had made for a dance and learned the dis­cip­line of Cun­ning­ham tech­nique. How free this felt, and what a relief after an even­ing in the Fox­woods’ heav­ily con­trolled environment.

In one of the films that was shown, Cun­ning­ham notes how dif­fi­cult it can be to make dan­cers on the stage seem real. “What is real?” he is asked. “It’s when they get bey­ond the per­fect stage,” Cun­ning­ham answers.

The most com­mon com­plaint about Taymor’s “Spider-Man” was that no one could fig­ure out what was going on. But in many theater tra­di­tions around the world (includ­ing ours), theater need not be a nar­rat­ive art. It’s what you don’t under­stand that can have the greatest res­on­ance. In Brook’s “Flute, for instance, get­ting bey­ond the per­fect could be noth­ing more than a wink or a walk across stage. Shar­ing the room with Mozart’s music, these ges­tures pro­duced waves of inef­fable mean­ing. And all that surely came about from slow, care­ful, quiet, private and, above all, focused work.

By spend­ing buck­ets of money, rely­ing on com­plex spe­cial effects, choos­ing a popular-culture sub­ject, Tay­mor all but invited huge amounts of damning pub­li­city and con­tro­versy. There could be no escap­ing pro­du­cers breath­ing down her neck or pre­ma­ture reviews.

Put­ting on exten­ded pre­views, with the tick­ets sold at premium prices, meant the inev­it­able blo­go­sphere explo­sion of ill-formed opin­ions. The crit­ics had no choice but to come early. The under­stand­able tend­ency was not to try to sup­port any sense of an unreal­ized vis­ion but to pounce and trounce.

Theater is a fra­gile medium. What doesn’t first work can if the spark is there and if atti­tudes can be changed. Tay­mor may have pulled it off adapt­ing “The Lion King” to the Broad­way stage, but “Spider-Man” dis­astrously col­lided with Broadway’s cor­por­ate culture.

“Broad­way is not a jungle,” Brook notes in “Empty Space,” “it is a machine.”

via latimes.com

Photo: from left Brook’s Magic Flute, Taymor’s Spider-Man

Share
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions
  • wp socializer sprite mask 16px Julie Taymor and Peter Brook: on the same path but in opposite directions

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Pinterest