- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link

Mario Martone's new production of Rigoletto at La Scala divided the public on the opening night. The 62-year-old Neapolitan film director has also directed many theatre productions and over the last 30 years, a handful of operas. His latest opera concept elicited 11 minutes of applause for the singers but a chorus of boos for the production team.
In the programme notes, Martone says, “I think it is fundamental to return to the violence that Verdi had in mind.” His present-day production saw a riot after Rigoletto (the Duke's ‘pusher' bringing pleasure to the palace) discovers Gilda's dead body. As an ambulance crew arrives and Rigoletto embraces his daughter there is a glimpse of the ensuing scene of a bloodbath as rioters armed with guns, knives and baseball bats, break into the Duke's palace and kill everybody, including the Duke. The curtain closes on this splatter scene, with blood on the walls, paintings, and the white, stylish sofas. Martone says, “A court of the very rich surrounded by people at their service who are subjected to abuse by them, also belongs to our times.”
The production underlines the contrast between the world of the privileged and that of the excluded with revolving scenery that reflects the two worlds: the Duke's palace with champagne and cocaine (and a bondage room), and then there's the periphery with its drug addicts and homeless, and where the waiters and the ‘escorts' of the parties sleep. Gilda and Rigoletto also live here.
Nadine Sierra was Gilda, Amartuvshin Enkhbat, Rigoletto, and Piero Pretti was the Duke of Mantua.
During the curtain calls there was applause for the cast (“Not bombastic but still applause,” said the Corriere della Sera newspaper), though some were less enthusiastic about the conductor, Michele Gamba, but with Mario Martone and his team of nine collaborators, a chorus of boos from the galleries began, counteracted by increasing applause from the stalls.
This very Milanese phenomenon has rarely been heard in recent years – “How wonderful,” said one punter, “Off with the masks and back with the boos… feels like old times.”
With a new top price of 300 Euros, at least it was an unforgettable evening.
Rigoletto, La Scala – Production photos

Graham Spicer is a writer, director and photographer in Milan, blogging (under the name ‘Gramilano') about dance, opera, music and photography for people “who are a bit like me and like some of the things I like”. He was a regular columnist for Opera Now magazine and wrote for the BBC until transferring to Italy.
His scribblings have appeared in various publications from Woman's Weekly to Gay Times, and he wrote the ‘Danza in Italia' column for Dancing Times magazine.
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
A cheer for the boos. I wish audiences, particularly Italian, would be more critical and more aware of their heritage. But modern audiences are so insecure, and so terrified of coming across as not riding whatever wave is fashionable at the time a new opera production is thrown at them, that they accept everything. We live in the “everything goes” era in which apparently everybody save the composer and the librettist have “rights” – the “right” to demolish an existing work of art.
Nobody questions anything. “I think it is fundamental to return to the violence that Verdi had in mind” says Martone. Based on what? Can he read Verdi’s mind from beyond the grave? Can we read about this strange quest for violence in Verdi’s letters? Not that I know of, but I stand corrected if he wrote about this. For now, without evidence, I take it Martone puts words in Verdi’s mouth. If Verdi had wanted the populace to storm the palace and kill the Duke, he would have told Piave so. We can read what Verdi wanted in the libretto – he had wanted for the Duke to go his merry way, singing a last insolent high B 😉 . Verdi had also placed Rigoletto’s modest house in a rather good neighborhood, just across the street from the Ceprano palace, not in the “periphery with its drug addicts and homeless” (“A sinistra, una casa di discreta apparenza con una piccola corte circondata da mura. Nella corte un grosso ed alto albero ed un sedile di marmo; nel muro, una porta che mette alla strada; sopra il muro, un terrazzo sostenuto da arcate. La porta del primo piano dà sul detto terrazzo, a cui si ascende per una scala di fronte. A destra della via è il muro altissimo del giardino e un fianco del palazzo di Ceprano.”) This is why the courtiers can fool Rigoletto and abduct Gilda with her father’s unwitting participation. Martone’s hubris is scary.
Is this the same Martone who did the Napoli Otello production? The Martone who said “Torno a Otello ma Desdemona non è più una vittima”? Extract from Verdi’s letter 1887, April 2nd:
“But Desdemona is not a woman, she’s a type! She is the type of goodness, of resignation, of sacrifice! There are creatures born for others, unconscious of their own ego!”
You won’t find this in the Naples Otello. Instead, you will find Desdemona with a gun, a walking ad for violence-derived “empowerment.”
If Martone wants to jump on the bandwagon of female empowerment (Otello) or social justice (Rigoletto), both on paper (ahem, stage), why doesn’t he create new original works to deal with the subject? Does he lack artistic imagination? It seems so. Or perhaps he lacks money – to make a movie you have to persuade private people to back you, to make an opera production based on schema X all you have to do is trust your begging hand under the nose of an opera manager and he will, very obligingly, put a wad of crisp bills in it, freshly out of the state coffers (in Europe.) And if the stage director lacks the mandatory artistic imagination for supporting the original work, better insult Verdi indirectly implying his oeuvre is so limited from a musical & dramatic point of view, it can’t speak to us on its own terms. And while the director is at it, better insult us too – we’re so backward, so devoid of imagination, we can’t understand anything that isn’t refashioned to make it look like it is literally about some contemporary issue, and totally at odds with the music and the text.
Sorry for the rant, you may delete it if you’d rather not have it on your site.
You articulated magnificently exactly what I was thinking and feeling on so many scores. Add to everything you said the infernal distraction of too many other things going on onstage that take the attention away from the singer and the singing.
I go to the opera to be carried away by beautiful music , beautiful settings to a fantasy world . If I were an opera singer I would not agree to perform in modern realistic reinterpretations of an opera , to something far removed from the original , which is visually disturbing , offensive to the eye . I think it is shocking how directors and set designers have taken over opera as a field for self interpretation . I feel sorry for young opera goes of today that get dished up this kind of monstrosity , in the name of appealing to a new generation with a visual creation they supposedly can identify with .
I was there and while I didn’t boo I get those who did.
First of all let me say I generally prefer “traditional” settings, and it’s not blind purism; it’s just modern versions often get distracted with forced allegories, minimalistic staging, transgression… Modernism for the sake of modernism. I don’t think newcomers need such changes to appreciate opera either, but quite on the contrary. However I do not object them. Sometimes you get something smart or spectacular, respectfully done, and it’s well worth the ticket.
Regardless of the setting, you can also subtly play with the story. A scene can change its meaning depending on who’s present or how they react. When it works it can be wonderful.
However in this case we got both, and it didn’t quite do it for me.
The rotating structure was intelligent and impressive, and its use as a storytelling device was good even if a bit on the nose (there are classes in the story, yes, there’s a jester and a king, we already got that). I felt it caused some sound problems because of the distance to the pit, fake walls, etc, but fair enough. I didn’t mind the bike, phones, clothes either… but the parallel scenes were distracting; often there were several things going on at the same time and you wouldn’t know where to look. In general I would say it was hit and miss.
The controversial ending however was just absurd. It completely twists the feeling of despair from the final scene for pure shock value that also ruins the point of the story with some dumb mob justice that comes out of nowhere. That’s just bad storytelling.
Performances were very good. Powerful, deep Rigoletto, with a touching Gilda. We noticed and clapped and cheered. But not so much the staging. Everyone paid for their ticket, and we all respectfully listened, but we’re also entitled to voice our opinion. If someone felt like booing at the end, they were free to do so, and there’s nothing wrong with that.