[Review] Northern Ballet’s Romeo and Juliet – more commercial than refined

Matthew Paluch sees Northern Ballet’s Romeo and Juliet – a show and a half, but subtlety and nuance don’t always feature
| Title | Romeo and Juliet |
| Company | Northern Ballet |
| Venue | Sadler’s Wells, London |
| Date | 28 May 2024 |
| Reviewer | Matthew Paluch |
Protests aren’t a surprise of late… but it is interesting to arrive at Sadler’s Wells with one taking place.
The musicians of the Northern Ballet Sinfonia have taken to the streets to highlight the important role live music plays in the theatre. Due to funding freezes and cuts Northern Ballet have had to massively reduce their touring schedule, and basically lose all live music accompaniment. The knock-on effect is huge, as we can imagine, and who knows where all of this arts and culture austerity will end…
To the show, and Christopher Gable’s 1991 production (with choreography by Massimo Moricone) of Romeo and Juliet. No one can deny that Northern Ballet put on a show and a half, but I’d argue that subtlety and nuance don’t always feature.
The set by Lez Brotherston is a masterpiece in its minimalism and adaptability – think crumbling, marble columns on wheels – however the same can’t always be said for the choreography or the role interpretations.
Act 1 starts and mostly doesn’t stop. There’s lots of story to get through, yet Gable’s take seems to be more is less. It feels overfacing from the outset, and key moments get drowned out due to the endless action from all sides.
Romeo has to grab Juliet to get her attention in the Ballroom – bizarre. And the iconic Dance of the Knights has become a mashup of Bōjutsu and the last spin cycle of an industrial strength washing machine.
The important first pas de deux of Juliet with her betrothed, Paris, is busied with four wannabe Juliets and partners dancing in and around the principal couple. Why? Worse – Juliet doesn’t even get a solo. The besties are back again!
The balcony pas de deux fairs a little better with some intimate emotion and visceral use of the back to show the physicalising of internal feelings… young love indeed.
Act 2 starts heavy-handed with bare-chested bird men and head-scarfed women for the Montagues, and aggressive, Darth Vader mask-wearing Capulets. The latter are named as ‘Cats’ in the programme, which explains the utterly bizarre miaowing and hissing that comes from the stage. It’s a new one on me. Perhaps I need to do further Shakespeare study, or did someone call Andrew Lloyd Webber in the interval?!

Aaron Kok as Mercutio is the real deal from the beginning of the evening, bringing agility and humour to the jester-like choreography. He also does well with the 2nd Act death scene – a dancer to watch out for.
Speaking of death scenes, Joseph Taylor’s likeable and loved up Romeo does some serious damage to Tybalt. Stabbing alone doesn’t seem to quench his bloody thirst, so he goes in for strangulation also.
Gable has created an interesting role for Lady Capulet, especially at the end of Act 2. Harriet Marden gives her everything, but like others, misses the layering of the character, and the power of subtlety in narrative communication. And the wig doesn’t help matters.
Act 3 should be where Juliet takes her dramatic journey even further, but I found Dominique Larose lacking in the role. She’s a beautiful dancer, with molten, lower leg work, but the overall characterisation needs further attention. Currently it goes from superficial to demented too quickly, and with nothing much else in-between.
The Act 3 bedroom pas de deux feels a bit flat, like it lacks choreographic structure to evoke emotional depth. And none of the duos between the star-crossed lovers suggest equality either with Juliet always presented as passive and being manhandled. I think Shakespeare had different ideas for his headstrong heroine. It’s a shame Gable and Moricone didn’t have the same vision.
The end of the ballet is poignant, when the two Lords of the opposing families embrace each other, standing over the corpses of their beloved offspring. Will lessons finally be learnt?
I can imagine that many people find this a satisfying show, as did I at times, but when one’s spent decades with other productions that really are plays without words, showing mastery of storytelling through stillness, pulling focus to the smallest of details, and letting Prokofiev’s epic score do most of the talking, then the bar is set very high I’m afraid.
This production ends up feeling more commercial than refined – the difference between drip feeding and waterboarding a narrative – and the only evident depth of character was in Heather Lehan’s Nurse, which was much appreciated!
I adore live music and believe that most good dance is inspired and instigated by the score that underpins it, so it pains me to say that Northern Ballet Sinfonia didn’t sound that great, but they didn’t. Specifically, the brass. And do we really need each Act to start with a rumble of thunder? Literalism at its worst. I’m sure Prokofiev is turning in his grave.







Did you mean to say “Gable’s take seems to be more is more” ?
If not, I don’t understand this in relation to the rest of the review.
Mercutio refers to Tybalt at the “Prince of Cats”, hence the catcalls.
Thanks for the feedback.
What a snob you are Mr Paluch.
Thanks for sharing your opinion Jeremy.
Fares, not fairs! And yes, if you study the Shakespeare in more depth you will discover the relevance of cats to Tybalt and thus the Capulets.
Thanks for the feedback Sim. Regardless of the direct reference to Shakespeare’s prose, I don’t believe the catcalling works in the dance production. My opinion of course. Not fact.
Saw this last night and loved it. The programme says “Capulets (Cats)”, not replacing Capulets (and the same with “Montagues (Birds)”) and as a way of turning around Mercutio’s tease I thought it worked, though not keen on sounds from the dancers in this sort of ballet. I think that the orchestra must have settled in now.
Good to hear!!